![]() (Since the 1950s acceptance of these treatments has been left up to the individual's conscience.) The first direct mention of the prohibition was in 1944: 'Not only as a descendant of Noah, but now also as one bound by God's law to Israel which incorporated the everlasting covenant regarding the sanctity of life-sustaining blood, the stranger was forbidden to eat or drink blood, whether by transfusion or by the mouth. Its introduction was a relatively gradual process and followed prior objections to vaccination, inoculation and sorgan transplantation. The prohibition of blood transfusions was introduced by the Society towards the end of World War II. The introduction of the blood transfusion taboo They represent one of the largest cults in the world today, publishing more material than all the other world cult groups combined. They deny, among other things, the Trinity, the personage of the Holy Spirit, the deity of Christ, bodily resurrection and a visible Second Coming. Whilst originally basing their doctrines on the King James Version, in 1961 they introduced their own version, `The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures', with significant alterations from other, accepted translations. The movement, originally known as Zion's Watchtower Society, preaches a literal belief in the Bible, aided by Russell's own `Aid to Bible Understanding'. Russell, reputedly a compelling speaker, had previously been a member of a conventional Christian church but then found reasons to disagree with much of its theology. The Jehovah's Witness movement was founded in 1884, in the United States, by Charles Taze Russell. It was that realisation which inspired me to research this article and I hope that it will be of use to any of you who are placed in a similar situation in the future.Ī brief history of the Jehovah's Witness movement Mind you when she later asked me to explain the reasons behind this unique prohibition I found my knowledge woefully inadequate. My fellow student, being unaware of JWs' stand on blood transfusions, did not consider this relevant information in a patient about to undergo an operation which, under normal circumstances, might need a blood transfusion. However it was just as well that we looked at her drug chart to check on some obscure medication: for there, in huge red letters, was scrawled `JW'. We'd been told that our consultant generally regarded the social history as a waste of time so we skimmed over it. Due to a shortage of patients another student actually `clerked' her whilst I just sat and listened, adding the odd constructive comment. She was my first surgical patient the Spanish lady in bed 16 admitted with acute biliary colic. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |